Know Thy User, Episode# 987346523: Ode to the Cupholder

Speaking of things that just work, or fail to, I would be remiss if I did not acknowledge the humble cup holder. My 1979 Volkswagen Rabbit and 1987 Volkswagen Golf had none. My 1995 Saab had only one, and that located very inconveniently back behind right my hip. Then somene started paying attention to real customers, and they bred like bacteria all over the automative industry -- my 2003 Honda Odyssey minvan had 17 of them -- enough for 7 two-fisted drinkers, with three left over, plus a collapsible eating able between the front seats. Matthew DeBord pays homage to the, in Slate's The Big Monday Blog at this link . Maybe automotive engineers don't care about eating in their cars, but real customers do. Just one more example: Know Thy User, For He Is Not Thee.

Bing Still Needs Work

Microsoft is spinning out a huge amount of hype, even by their own standards, for Bing, their new search engine which they hope will challenge Google. They have a long way to go to get even close. Here's an example:

I'm in Milano, Italy right now. I just finished my keynote of Remix Italia yesterday, to a really fantastic audience. I love speaking to such turned-on people. Today I'm taking the day off, and I figured I'd go downtown and see the famous cathedral, one of the largest and finest in the world. I wanted to read a little about it before I went there, so I type the name into the search engine box on the MSN home page. As humans do, I made a small slip and typed in the phrase "milan cagthedral". Did Bing recognize this and do its best to figure out what I mean? It did not. It showed me the following screen, telling me to spell my words correctly:

It's MY fault. I have to be precise. Bing won't help me. I have to meet its expectations. Google, on the other hand, if it can't get what the user asks for, has always done its best to figure out what the user really meant and do its best to satisfy that user. When I type the same misspelled phrase into Google, here's what I get:

"I couldn't find exactly what you wanted, but here's the next best thing, the closest I could come to what I think you want. Is that OK with you?" That's what Google says. Not, "Hey dimwit, pay attention and do it right, and then maybe I'll deign to speak to you, and then again maybe I won't," which is how Bing's message feels to me.

This feature of Google has been around a long time. It recognizes that users are human. Bing's behavior requires users to become more like a computer: diligent, thorough, precise. We are none of these things naturally, that's why we invented computers. Google recognizes, respects, even enhances the humanity of its users.

If Bing intends to seriously challenge Google, Microsoft is going to have to change its perception of who its users are. Because the one thing that every single user of Bing has in common is that they are all human.

Come See My Keynote at Remix Italia

I'll be giving the keynote talk, "Why Software Sucks", at Remix Italia in Milano this Wednesday June 17. Information and registration is at http://www.microsoft.com/italy/nextweb/remix/index.aspx . Hope I'll see you there

More Foolishness from UPS.com

Those of you who have read my book or seen me in person will no doubt remember how awful the UPS.com web site is. One of my readers tangled with them lately and has this to say. He reports receiving the following email:

[reader's name], we've missed you!

Our records indicate that you have not taken advantage of My UPS recently. To keep your registration active, simply log in to My UPS before Monday, June 29, 2009. If you no longer have a need for My UPS, do nothing and your registration will expire on Monday, June 29, 2009.

Here is the reader's comment to them, which he sent via their web page. BTW, you have to work through 5 separate screen to send them an email. My reader must have been really angry to go through all that effort:


It does not help me to have you "time out" my registration. It seems that it only helps you to perhaps clean out your files.Your customer is not YOU it is ME. I have website logins that I have not used in years that still know about me just fine. Since your website is well known for not responding well to your customers (see book Why Software Sucks by David Platt), I am not surprised by your request. I will email Mr. Platt with this latest stupidity.

UPS still hasn't gotten it through their heads that making their users think is a bad idea. I hope the rest of you can learn from their example what not to do.

Using WPF for Good and Not Evil

I've just written a major post entitled Using WPF for Good and Not Evil. It examines the Family.Show sample application often used as an example of the great things that the power of WPF allows you to do. It is that, and it's also an example of the awful things that the power of WPF allows you to inflict on a user if you're not careful with it. As with a chain saw, power used with careful thought can accomplish great things, but without that careful thought hurts more than it helps. These developers use the exact same features to delight and also infuriate the user in the same application. Read the full article at this link.

What Do Microsoft.com and Tampax.com Have in Common?

They both inflict physical pain on their viewers through the deliberate choices of their designers. My take on these sites is too large to fit in a blog entry, so I've written in more detail on my newsletter at http://www.rollthunder.com/Newsletter/newslv10n2.htm . Looking at these sites caused my to coin Plattski's Law of Minimum Chiropractic. It states simply that forcing a user to visit a chiropractor will not make him happy, so you want to do that as little as possible. These sites violate it.